Notes for Gemelo 28

There are usually one or two points of interest in an Observer barred puzzle, and here we pick them out for comment. Please feel free to add your own questions or observations on any aspect of the puzzle (including clues not listed below) either by using the comment form at the bottom of the page or, if would prefer that your question/comment is not publicly visible, by email.

Gemelo 28

This puzzle is available at https://content-api.slowdownwiseup.co.uk/api/mobile/v1/puzzle-data/00c5ba8e-987a-47b4-96d3-a3557823e4b8/file/puzzle.pdf.

Solver difficulty rating

3.5 based on 29 votes (voting is now closed)

Last week’s ‘Spooner or Letter’ special, which seemed to go down well with solvers (including myself), received a difficulty rating of 3.8, based on 37 votes, the most popular award being 4/5. Given that this sort of special has never appeared before, and some of the ‘name the letter’ clues took a bit of getting one’s head around, this seemed a pretty fair assessment. Let’s hope that Gemelo can come up with a few more ‘specials’ of similar quality and difficulty.

For me, today’s plain puzzle harked back to the early Gemelos, with rather too many clues which would have been extremely difficult to solve ‘cold’ (ie without crossing letters). I’ll be interested to hear what other solvers made of it. I marked significantly more than 16 clues as being potentially worthy of note, so just let me know if there are any which I haven’t covered below that you would like me to comment on.

Readers may be interested in this post on the Observer site about the evening session held to celebrate 100 years of their barred crossword (the work of just four setters – Torquemada, Ximenes, Azed, and now Gemelo). Courtesy of a correspondent, here is a link to the short film which was shown at the event.

I was saddened this week to hear of the death of long-time Azed competitor John Tozer, who had been ill for several years following a heart attack. Those who knew John have nothing but good things to say about him; I never met him, although we exchanged a few friendly emails about particular points in Azed puzzles, but his masterwork (and a lasting legacy) is the wonderful &lit site. Apart from being an invaluable resource when setting Azed competition clues over many years, it is a treasury of clues from 77 years of Ximenes and Azed comps and of the accompanying slips containing much cruciverbal wisdom. RIP, John.

Setters’ Corner: This week I’m going to look at clues 33a, “1 across eating this stew (10)”, and 4d, “You don’t mind Japanese food (4)”. In the first of these the wordplay involves an anagram (‘stew’, verb) of EATING THIS; in the second the phrase YOU DON’T contains (‘mind’, verb) the answer. These examples illustrate one of the few points that Azed and I have always disagreed over, and on which it seems Gemelo takes a similarly lenient line. In the slip for comp 2,036, Azed wrote:

“In my clue to PLIANCY (‘Being flexible I can swim in strand’) should not ‘swim’ be ‘swims’ for the anagram to work cryptically? This took me back to a similar question I put many years ago to Ximenes when the late Eric Chalkley won first prize with this clue to PANTOPHAGIST: ‘What pig has to become when gripped by hunger? (anag. in pant, & lit.). Surely, I asked, it should be ‘becomes’, unless he accepted that as a singular string of words or a plural set of words, in this case three of them, it could govern a singular or a plural verb. He replied (I still have his pencilled note) that yes, he did think either a singular or a plural verb was OK, ever since when I’ve followed his dictum, both in my own clues and in my judgement on those of others.”

For my money, a single string of ‘fodder’ such as I CAN or EATING THIS must take a singular verb, so ‘see car crashes’ is valid for CREASE; however, there are those – including Azed and (it would seem) Gemelo – who believe that ‘see cars crash’ is acceptable for CREASES. I consider that this is at odds with ‘real world’ English, but in any event a continuous string of words must surely require either a singular verb or a plural verb – the setter cannot have their cake in one clue while eating it in another, hence I can’t accept that both ‘see car crash’ and ‘see car crashes’ can legitimately lead to CREASE. Incidentally, the use of the participle verb form usually offers a way round this issue, as in eg ‘see cars crashing’ for CREASES.

Across

1a Stammering European swallowing bread without restraint (10)
A four-letter European from Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania contains (‘swallowing’) a three-letter ‘sweet roll or cake’, of which many are eaten at this time of year (quite a few of them by me, in truth), which itself contains (‘without’) a three-letter ‘restraint’.

10a A Room of One’s Own keeping you initially satisfied, but not any more (5)
The letter A (from the clue) is followed by a three-letter slang term for a room or home of one’s own which I particularly associate with the 1960s (“Let’s go back to my ??? and listen to some groovy sounds”) containing the first letter (‘initially’) of ‘you’. The answer is shown by Chambers as ‘archaic’, hence the ‘but not any more’.

12a Stain stuck with prisoner at first (8, 2 words)
A five-letter word meaning ‘stuck’, as an unlucky toreador might be, is preceded by (‘with…at first’) a three-letter slang term for a prisoner (the shortened form of a seven-letter word). The answer is (5,3).

13a Glaswegian to fashion mohawks, steering clear of prime spots (3)
There was a discussion on this site quite recently about the use of ‘prime locations in…’ to indicate the selection of letters 2, 3, 5, 7 etc from the word or words that follow, a device seemingly first used by Monk in a Times puzzle from 2005.  Here we have a variation, where the letters in the ‘prime spots’ within MOHAWKS are to be deleted rather than selected.

15a Capital T put back in “Tongue” (5)
The capital of Peru (and home of Paddington’s Aunt Lucy) and the letter T (from the clue) are to be reversed in order to produce the name of a particular ‘tongue’.

17a Old German lacking in soul (4)
A six-letter ‘obsolete’ word meaning ‘German’ is deprived of (‘lacking’) the consecutive letters IN.

26a Sodium chloride originally turned bracken orange-red (7)
The two-letter chemical symbol for sodium and the first letter (‘originally’) of ‘chloride’ are followed by a reversal of a four-letter kind of bracken found in New Zealand and Tasmania (also the name of the plantation in Georgia which Scarlett O’Hara called home, and the ancient seat of the High Kings of Ireland, in the halls of which the harp once shed the soul of music).

32a Islander‘s wine bar returned vermouth (5)
A seven-letter wine from Tuscany loses (‘bar’) a reversal (‘returned’) of a two-letter ‘informal’ term for a particular kind of vermouth, almost invariably seen in the company of gin.

Down

1d Is sewer to accumulate dogs for absent-minded don? (12)
The ‘absent-minded don’ is William Archibald Spooner, fellow of Cue Knowledge, Oxford, who last week had half a puzzle to himself. Here the spoonerism is of a five-letter word meaning ‘to pile’ or ‘to accumulate’ (usually seen with ‘up’) and a seven-letters word for dogs of the female persuasion. The definition is crafty, although it perhaps pushes the boundaries of acceptability – ‘is sewing’ would certainly be ok, but wouldn’t produce a sensible surface reading. Apparently Spooner was sensitive on the topic of his verbal slips; one of his students described being part of a group that gathered outside the venerable don’s lodgings one evening, calling for a speech; that gentleman reportedly opened his window for just long enough to reply, “You don’t want a speech. You only want me to say one of those things”.

2d Handsome man, apparently with depression, shedding clothing (6)
The two-letter abbreviation for ‘apparently’ is followed by a six-letter ‘depression’ of the physical kind missing its first and last letters (‘shedding clothing’).

3d Previous change of course mostly elevated drink (6)
A four-letter nautical term for a change of course achieved by swinging the sail of a boat from one side to the other, lacking its last letter (‘mostly’), is reversed (‘elevated’) ahead of an informal word for a drink, as in “Well, if you insist, just a quick ???”.

5d Judge cutting politician’s roast (7)
A three-letter short form of the seven-letter word for the type of ‘judge’ known to football fans as (among many less savoury epithets) ‘the man [or woman] in black’ is contained by (‘cutting’) a four-letter word for a member of a certain UK political party.

8d Heart skipped in intricate pulse (4)
A six-letter word meaning ‘intricate’, from the eight-letter name of the mythical artist who designed the Cretan labyrinth and made wings for his son, albeit using unsuitable materials, loses its two central letters (‘heart skipped’).

19d Referee finally books tackling of winger, saving centre forward for Monaco (7, 2 words)
Crikey, this is a bit convoluted, and in the end the surface reading is nothing to write home about. The last letter (‘finally’) of ‘referee’ is followed by the two-letter representation of (biblical) books that isn’t ‘OT’ containing a five-letter word meaning ‘relating to birds’ (ie ‘of winger[s]’) without its middle letter (‘saving centre’). The answer is (deux, cinq).

23d Asian title reflected North American or South American tree (6)
The four-letter Japanese title ‘given to an exalted or distinguished person’ (and also perhaps to Sam Allardyce by people who didn’t want to say his surname) precedes a reversal (‘reflected’) of the two-letter abbreviation for ‘North American’.

25d Referring to missing pastry scoop (5)
That familiar two-letter bit of commercial jargon meaning ‘referring to’ is deleted from (‘missing’) a seven-letter word for ‘a kind of choux pastry, the dough of which has been mixed with grated cheese prior to baking’. Yum.

(definitions are underlined)

You may also like...

19 Responses

  1. Griff Everett says:

    Tvm for enlightenment – was thoroughly done over by G; took s for small and consequently looked for weapon under h.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      I briefly had a similar thought when I first read the clue, but I decided that G wouldn’t have used a non-Chambers abbreviation, even one that has very strong claims for inclusion in the Big Red Book.

  2. Griff Everett says:

    30ac: answer seems obvious (with two unchecked aitches) but can’t verify the weapon?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      You’ve got the right answer, and the weapon is in Chambers as a separate headword immediately underneath the more familiar word, with a different etymology being suggested. The OED disagrees on that point, listing both meanings under the same headword; similarly, there is a single Collins entry.

  3. Stu says:

    I dragged the wife to last week’s Observer event. It was good fun.

  4. Stu says:

    I was always jealous of John Tozer’s frequent wins/mentions in the clue writing competition. All my efforts landed in the ‘must do better pile’. His name stood out as there are some Tozers in my extended family, which led me to notice him on Only Connect a few years ago. His team did quite well, I seem to remember.

    Like most, some fun was bookended by a grind to get going and another to finish. I got there in the end, but only just.

    I had no idea how to parse 13. Genius! Didn’t like 1D. Was Spooner even absent minded?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      You can watch John in his first appearance on Only Connect.

      I’m not aware that Spooner was any more absent-minded than many other Oxford dons – my desperate hope in years gone by that the dentist would forget to turn up for our appointment was never fulfilled (I did once go to the barber only to find that he had emigrated), but it was not unknown for my tutorial partner and I to be ‘stood up’, invariably (need I say) when I was unusually well prepared.

  5. Anon Cues says:

    This felt like a slog after last week’s delightful puzzle, I have to say! Solved 4d and 33a wondering what you might say… Don Manley suggests both singular and plural are acceptable in these circumstances in his book, and I’ve seen others argue the same. I did enjoy 1d – quite an amusing Spoonerism.

    I still can’t parse 9d which is driving me a bit mad. Clearly an &lit as it reads as a single (not even cryptic) definition. Perhaps it will come to me over the coming days before it ends up on fifteensquared.

    Not a fan of “without” meaning “outside” in 1a. I found it used previously in a Guardian puzzle, but the only instances of this usage in real life that I’ve come across are either in Scottish legalese “without this agreement” and old London churches (St. Sepulchre-without-Newgate)…

    I have the Inquisitor on the go – enjoying that a bit more!

    • Doctor Clue says:

      I wrote a clue with a wordplay along the lines of ‘X, Y rock’, and the editor changed ‘rock’ to ‘rocks’. I queried this, on the basis that the comma split the fodder into two discrete elements. The reply was along the lines that solvers would be confused by a plural verb, even with the comma there. I stand by my plural verb in that instance, but I absolutely won’t accept that ‘X Y rock’ is valid.

      No, 9d isn’t an &lit – you need to break it into two parts, one part leading to the answer and the other being a definition of it. It’s more of a back-page kind of clue.

      Gemelo is unapologetic about using the preposition ‘without’ as a containment indicator (he told me so!), but while I’m absolutely fine with the adverb (‘Y, X without’) I don’t accept the archaic ‘outside’ sense of the preposition required by ‘X without Y’, this being the sort of thing that doesn’t help when trying to persuade new solvers that setters are not all hopelessly out of date. I recently tried the Goldilocks puzzle in The Observer and found I was, er, hopelessly out of date 😲.

      • Anon Cues says:

        Ah thanks for the hint – parsed 9d now…

        Are there other barred cryptic series you’d recommend? I’ve been trying a few, and seem to be getting a taste for them (although I’ve been doing blocked ones as well – good to give the dictionary a rest now and then)!

        • Doctor Clue says:

          In terms of plain or ‘lightly-themed’ puzzles (typically not involving changes to the completed grid, highlighting etc) the options are basically Mephisto (Sunday Times, paywalled), Azed/Gemelo, and the Spectator (paywalled). If you don’t mind doing ‘non-current’ puzzles, there are close to 1,000 Azed crosswords available on the Guardian web site and indexed through the &lit site. Go to https://andlit.org.uk/azed/puzzles.php, select a year, say 2010, and you will see list of all the Azed puzzles from that year along with their type (‘Plain’, ‘Spoonerisms’ etc); clicking on the link will take you to that puzzle on the Guardian site. The crosswords from 1,762 (March 2006) onwards are PDFs, and the puzzles between then and the early 2020s are high class.

          For more intensively themed puzzles, typically one-off treatments of a specific topic, there are the Listener (Saturday Times and online, paywalled), the Inquisitor in Saturday’s i newspaper, and the Enigmatic Variations in the Sunday Telegraph (a link to a copy of the puzzle is normally posted on The Answerbank around 11.00 on the Sunday of publication. The Crossword Centre (http://www.crossword.org.uk/) offers a free themed puzzle every month, usually from a setter who also produce puzzles for the Listener/IQ/EV series. Beyond that, there are subscription-only magazines such as the Magpie (five crosswords a month of varying difficulties, plus a numerical) and the Crossword Club (three puzzles a month).

          • Anon Cues says:

            Thanks for those! Currently working through the latest Inquisitor and enjoying a “misprinted definitions” special.
            Lovely to be able to go back to older Azed puzzles – will savour those. I recently took a trip to the Museum of the Home and found an old copy of the Observer magazine containing one of his, from the year I was born, no less. Nice to be made to feel young occasionally!

  6. 🍊 says:

    Nope — didn’t like this one at all 😞 especially as last week’s was such fun.

  7. Alex says:

    At first I thought this was going to be a doddle, then got a bit bogged down in the south-east corner. A stiff challenge but great fun! I notice that Gemelo isn’t averse to the odd ‘intra-grid cross reference’. (two this week – 33a and 28d). I think this device, the crossword equivalent of breaking the fourth wall, has its place but perhaps not in a non-themed, barred puzzle. Taken out of context, this type of clue is meaningless. Was it Ximenes or Azed who said something like “a good cryptic clue should be a miniature piece of prose”? Any thoughts?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      It was Azed who said that clues are ‘small pieces of English prose’, the spirit of which I agree with, although I think that clues as true pieces of English prose went out with Afrit and offerings like ‘This monster has elements which may be given to rumination, the human element being put in to complete the mixture (8)’. I have no problem with clues referencing other parts of the puzzle, but I do have a problem with a clue like 33 which makes no sense as written, being not even a meaningful piece of English telegraphese/crosswordese; I believe any reference to an answer elsewhere in the grid should be integrated within the surface reading, so ‘Top 20’ as an instruction to remove the first letter from the answer at 20, or (for older readers) ‘Police 5’ to indicate an anagram of the answer at 5. If the answer at 7 were CAT, “Blake’s 7” could perhaps work for TYGER. Allowing answers to be referenced by name, eg ‘four’ for the answer at 4d, would expand the setter’s scope but would, I think, be unfair, since clues and grid entries are always identified using Arabic numerals.

  8. Tim C says:

    This one I found a real struggle, but at least I’ve learned a new way of indicating a Spoonerism.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      There are a lot of ‘dons’ out there, and in my experience applying the ‘absent-minded’ filter doesn’t greatly reduce the number. Suffice to say that I won’t be using such an indication myself.

  9. Iain Archer says:

    19d, ha. I got away with thinking the “winger, saving centre” was from the middle part of a Dutch footballer’s name; no doubt of the solution, but put it down as ‘to be checked’. When I entered my completed version online, btw, I discovered that I couldn’t find any way to save it there, and there were other signs of (?) disimprovement — or perhaps just tinkering still going on. When I switched browsers some minutes later and tried again, I could see part of the completed puzzle, and my accumulated entry time, so possibly still WIP.

  10. Luciano Ward says:

    Did not know of John Tozer’s death. Agree with your estimation of him. A terrific clue-writer and, as you mention, the creator and sustainer of the wonderful &lit site.

Leave a Reply to Tim C Cancel reply

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be published.