Notes for Gemelo 27

There are usually one or two points of interest in an Observer barred puzzle, and here we pick them out for comment. Please feel free to add your own questions or observations on any aspect of the puzzle (including clues not listed below) either by using the comment form at the bottom of the page or, if would prefer that your question/comment is not publicly visible, by email.

Gemelo 27 – Spooner or Letter

This puzzle is available at https://cdn.slowdownwiseup.co.uk/media/documents/obs.GEMELO.20260315.pdf.

Solver difficulty rating

3.8 based on 37 votes (voting is now closed)

Good to see a proper special, and a brand-new one at that. Azed set a number of Spoonerisms puzzles, of course, but as well as the spoonerized definitions they contained spoonerized entries, which were on occasion mildly controversial. Gemelo has pursued a different course by giving us a 50:50 mix of spoonerized definitions and ‘turn one or more letters into their names’ wordplays. A couple of the latter (in particular 7d) took me a little while to get my head round, but they all worked out in the end. I’ll be interested to hear what you made of the puzzle and how much of a challenge it presented. My only specific piece of advice for solving would be to go through each clue saying any possible ‘unspoonerisms’ to yourself; if you can’t find any, then the clue is almost certainly of the Letter type. After notes on selected clues I have included a checklist of clue types.

Setters’ Corner: This week I’m going to look at clue 9d, “Horribly stern and extremely tight (7)”. The trickiest thing about this clue, an anagram (‘horribly’) of STERN, is the fact that two letters are transformed prior to entry in the grid. The point of interest, though, is the word ‘and’ linking the wordplay with the definition. In normal clues, this would be entirely acceptable, but what about here? The wordplay yields just five letters while the defined word has seven, so despite what the ‘and’ suggests there appears to be no equivalence between them. Where the wordplay and definition lead to different sets of letters, link words between wordplay and definition should normally be avoided, but the situation here is rather unusual. The preamble tells us that the replacement of letters is in effect part of the process of deciphering the clue, so the defined entry and the end result of the wordplay could be considered the same. It’s perhaps marginal, but I’m comfortable enough with the clue as it stands. There would have been no issue at all with the use of link words or phrases in the spoonerized clues, but I applaud Gemelo for avoiding them in this puzzle and thus producing more technically satisfying clues.

Across

1a Old soul had to play one of the Australian Avengers (9)
A two-letter word for an ancient Egyptian (‘old’) spirit or soul is followed by an anagram (‘to play’) of HAD. The ‘translation’ of one letter results in a net gain of four.

10a Drunk about to lose book for university course (9, 3 words)
The word ‘about’ (from the clue) loses the usual single-letter abbreviation for ‘book’, which is replaced by the three initials of a degree course first offered at Oxford in 1921 and taken by many British politicians past and present including Tony Benn, Edward Heath, Michael Foot, Ed Miliband, Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak and Rachel Reeves. The answer is (1,5,3).

12a Be part of Keir Starmer’s top two after affirmative vote (5)
The first two letters (‘top two’) of ‘Starmer’ follow a three-letter ‘formal or archaic’ word for an affirmative vote or voter.

17a Heartless, stealthy criminal sold E (6)
The tricky bit of this clue is the spoonerism, with the wordplay involving an anagram (‘criminal’) of STEALTHY missing the central pair of letters (‘heartless’).

18a Pinks in last frames of uncommon challenge with nothing in front (5)
The first and last letters (‘frames’) of ‘uncommon’ and ‘challenge’ are preceded by the single-letter representation of zero (ie ‘with nothing in front’). Part of the unspoonerized definition is a qualifier which reflects the presence of ‘formerly’ in the relevant Chambers definition.

21a Nothing saw to May, somehow seated at ten with Heath lacking any energy (12, 3 words)
An anagram (‘somehow’) of SEATED AT TEN and HEATH without all instances of the usual abbreviation for energy (ie ‘lacking any energy’).

30a Rogue messenger once seen in Scottish town (5)
A double definition, except that the first definition leads to a familiar three-letter word which then requires a letter expansion.

33a Welsh river crossed by predominantly underground soldier (9)
A three-letter Welsh river which rises on the Black Mountain and flows into the Bristol Channel at Newport is contained by a five-letter word for an urban railway that runs largely underground (in particular, the one in Paris) without its last letter (‘predominantly’).

Down

5d What bums in a County Court, framing South African man about scam (7)
The two-letter abbreviation for ‘court’ contains (‘framing’) a two-letter informal South African word for a man (also the abbreviation for ‘Open University’), which itself contains (‘about’) a three-letter slang term for a swindle or trick. After unspoonerization of the definition, the ‘County’ still has a capital letter, but not the one it started with.

7d Fraternity member once cycling round loch (6)
Initially I was convinced there was something wrong with this clue, but when you take the four-letter name of perhaps the most famous, and certainly the most monstrous, Scottish loch and ‘cycle’ it such that the first two letters end up after the last two, replacement of the first and third letters by their names will indeed produce the answer.

8d Lord is cooped in this castle abroad, with Austen hero briefly returning to visit (10)
An anagram (‘abroad’) of CASTLE has a reversal (‘returning’) of the surname of a Jane Austen hero (think Colin Firth) missing its last letter (‘briefly’) inserted (‘to visit’, not to my taste, but there it is). The answer is hyphenated, 4-6, and contains an apostrophe, something which Azed was unsure about whether to mention in an enumeration but Gemelo clearly feels does not need to be flagged (and I agree with him).

16d Stand-in worker perhaps supporting tradename, one with extended line of letters? (7)
A three-letter word for a stand-in (maybe for a footballer whose number is up)  precedes a three-letter creature ‘of proverbial industry’ (the sort that had high hopes of moving a rubber tree plant) which itself follows (‘supporting’) the two-letter abbreviation for ‘tradename’.

19d One’s restaurant discarding skin from radicchio bought of salad monger? (7)
A (1,2) phrase meaning “one’s” (or ‘one is’) is followed by a six-letter word for an intimate, relaxed type of restaurant, from which the first and last letters (‘skin’) of ‘radicchio’ have been removed.

20d Characters in ancient city found within nanoseconds (7)
A two-letter preposition which can mean essentially the same as ‘in’ when referring to a place, although the two are rarely interchangeable, and the two-letter ancient city much favoured by crossword setters are contained by the two-letter abbreviation for ‘nanoseconds’.

24d Take in second habit from a rat? (5)
The single-letter abbreviation of the Latin word meaning ‘take’, formerly used by physicians at the start of prescriptions, is contained by a word for ‘second’, as in ‘hang on a second’.

25d Boeing people share new speed for signalling – without British Airways, that is (5)
The usual abbreviation for ‘new’ is followed by a four-letter word for a unit of data transmission rate, which has been deprived of the abbreviation for ‘British Airways’, and the two letters regularly indicated in cryptics by ‘that is’. When I first started in IT, the unit was commonplace, being used interchangeably with ‘bits per second’ (although they are not exactly the same thing). I well remember using acoustic couplers to connect to remote computers at a rate of 300 of them (on a good day) by shoving a phone handset into the two rubber cups of the device; unfortunately, most of the phones in our office were shared extensions, and when someone tried to make a call on the linked phone, things went rapidly downhill (there was no error correction in those days). After that, even very slow broadband seems quite wonderful.

(definitions are underlined)

Checklist of clue types (S = Spooner / L1 = 1 Letter / L2 = 2 Letters /L3 = 3 Letters)

Across: 1 – L1; 10 – L1; 11 – S; 12 – S; 14 – L1; 15 – S; 17 – S; 18 – S; 19 – L1; 21 – S; 23 – S; 24 – L1; 26 – S; 28 – L1; 30 – L1; 31 – L1; 32 – S; 33 – L1.

Down: 1 – L1; 2 – S; 3 – L1; 4 – L1; 5 – S; 6 – S; 7 – L2; 8 – S; 9 – L2; 13 – L3; 16 – L1; 19 – S; 20 – L1; 22 – S; 24 – S; 25 – S; 27 – L1; 29 – S.

You may also like...

30 Responses

  1. Blake Norton says:

    For me, the most enjoyable Gemelo special so far.

  2. Alison Essex-Cater says:

    Even with your explanation I’m having a problem with 9d, I have an a as the 3rd letter giving the only option as nearest but surely I should have an en and an ar to make that work, some illumination would be gratefully received.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi Alison

      ‘Horribly stern’ gives NERST, the R is replaced by AR (NEARST) and the S is replaced by ES (NEAREST, ‘extremely tight’).

      Hope that makes sense!

  3. Adelaide says:

    I have read the instructions over and over and have no idea how the letters clue work – Im assuming 24 across is a simple ND in another word but so what ? What happens to the E ???

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi Adelaide

      In the ‘Letter’ clues the definition leads to the grid entry, but the wordplay requires one or more individual letters to be ‘expanded’ into their names, as given by Chambers, eg B = BEE, H = AITCH, S = ES.

      In 24a, ‘Essay carrying no date with it (6), the definition is ‘with it’, which leads to TRENDY. The wordplay has TRY (‘essay’) containing (‘carrying’) ND (‘no date’), producing TRNDY. Expanding the N to EN yields TRENDY. You have to decide which letter or letters must be ‘translated’; here, expanding the R to AR would also have supplied six letters, but they would not have satisfied the definition. In the checklist of clue types following the notes, this clue is shown as L1, ie one letter must be replaced with its name.

      I hope that helps.

      • Adelaide says:

        Brilliant – thanks

      • Adelaide says:

        Well once I understood the instructions I thought this was brilliant – plenty of laugh out loud moments ( not literally of course) – and would definitely say it’s a 4 in the hardness stakes. I make no apologies for using cheat aids – both hard copy and PC based – don’t we all – be honest ?

  4. Iain Archer says:

    Stu, that one does I think still carry on as a lively relic. Chambers C20th had a page on symbols and phrases used in Medicine and Pharmacy. On prescriptions it includes: “The Superscription, which consists of the letter ℞, is a relic of the days of astrology. It originally was used to represent the symbol of the planet Jupiter. By common consent it is now regarded as representing the imperative mood of the Latin verb _recipere_, to take.”

    Unicode character “℞” (U+211E) is named “Prescription Take”. I think Rx is still used for it in practice in plain text, though I’ve not seen that in current Chambers. Prn is another prescriptive abbreviation still there, but I think it’s one of few survivors; things do move on. When I was eleven my uncle gave me his old chemical scale — two shallow brass pans hanging from the ends of a beam — along with some metal foil weights to measure Apothecaries’ grains and scruples, and notes including more (?) ‘astrological’ style symbols to denote them. Didn’t otherwise see many of them about, and they were officially supplanted by the metric system in 1971. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apothecaries%27_system

  5. MuchPuzzled says:

    I am always surprised at the clues you select to provide help for, as for this puzzle 18A and 8D were my first entries before coming here, and yet no mention is made of the horror show that is 13D !
    I gave up on this on Sunday, thinking it was essentially not worth the effort, but came back in a better mood yesterday and polished it off with your hints. Some really flaky definitions in here, e.g. 16D, 19D, which just added to the complexity. In my opinion, anyone who rates this as less than a resounding ‘5’ for difficulty needs to get out more! An enormous challenge.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      My usual method is to mark when solving the puzzle:

      (i) Any clues that I had problems solving – they are certain to make the final cut
      (ii) Any clues that I know from experience solvers are likely to find tricky (eg composite anagrams in Azeds)
      (iii) Clues which I think are unusual (one of these might get moved into Setter’s Corner)
      (iv) Clues which are – in my opinion – of questionable soundness (also potential candidates for Setter’s Corner)

      I normally limit myself to sixteen clues in total from the four categories.

      The problem with Gemelo 27 was that we have never had a ‘turn letters into their names’ puzzle before, so I didn’t know which of the 18 clues might give problems. I struggled to get my head round 7d, so that was a shoo-in; beyond that, I thought that the checklist showing the ‘Letter’ clues and the number of letters to be expanded would help, particularly where there were two or, as in 13d, three expansions. I did put a small mark against 13d, but the ‘regular letters’ device persuaded me to exclude it. I didn’t think 8d was particularly difficult, but it was a good example of a clue where the unspoonerized definition contained a qualifier (‘in past’), which seemed just about worthy of comment (that clue and 12a found themselves just above the cut line).

  6. stu says:

    24D was the only one that bamboozled me. “The single-letter abbreviation of the Latin word meaning ‘take’, formerly used by physicians at the start of prescriptions.” So, a word in a language no one speaks, abbreviated in a way no one ever abbreviates anymore … I know that, back in the day, cryptics used to require a fundamental knowledge of Latin and Greek, but wasn’t this all left behind in the 1950s? I vaguely remember some gripes on 225 about this being used in a Graun crossword a few years ago. TBH, I’m not a fan.

    I took the direction as “Take in” to get the right answer, but (obvs) couldn’t parse it by spelling out a letter. I then saw the Spoonerism, realised I was correct, and couldn’t be bothered to work it out 🙂

    Only one answer unparsed, and a slow but steady erosion of the clues. I’d say that was 3 hours well wasted on a top-drawer puzzle. Thanks Dr C and Mr G

    Thanks for the post.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      When it comes to barred puzzles which cite Chambers as their primary reference, anything in the Big Red Book is considered fair game – Chambers gives ‘r’ as an abbreviation for ‘recipe (Latin), take’, so it’s fine in (say) a Gemelo.

      The range of abbreviations allowed in blocked puzzles is narrower, and I would expect/hope not to see ‘recipe’ or ‘take’ for R in a UK back-pager. Strangely, though, while ‘small’ for S and ‘large’ for L will often be seen in blocked puzzles (as will their abbreviations on a great many articles of clothing), they aren’t allowed in most barred ones because (for reasons best known to the editors) they don’t appear in Chambers.

  7. Anon Cues says:

    Oh my, this looks like a serious challenge! Printed and will chip away at over the week – hoping I won’t need any hints but reassuring to know they’re here if I do. Thanks Doc!

    • Anon Cues says:

      Just completed! I have to say that despite some initial apprehension, I really enjoyed this. I only peeked at two of your hints above in the end: 8d to query the one vs two word situation, and 5d because I couldn’t see the spoonerism. (Re the latter I kicked myself as I’m sure it would have occurred to me eventually. I don’t think I agree about 8d. In most cases, I would – hyphenated words are essentially one word. But in this case, unlike Chambers, Collins has it as two separate words, and there is of course a novel by that name, unhyphenated… Plus a possessive apostrophe within a hyphenated word feels very wrong to me. But this is a gripe with Chambers more than Gemelo I suppose!)

      Many highlights but 12d was possibly my favourite – great surface disguising a very cunning spoonerism.

      A few surfaces I found a bit strained (which is what always put me off barred cryptics in the first place) e.g. 21a, 32a, 5d, 29d but they just about work I guess.

      Anyway I hope we get more like this because it was a very satisfying solve (especially once I got into the swing of it).

      • Doctor Clue says:

        I’m glad to hear that you enjoyed the puzzle. Accommodating the spoonerized definition in a convincing surface can be tricky, and I felt that Gemelo did a pretty good job without resorting to multiple initial letters or the like.

        Just to clarify my remark about the enumeration in 8d. Azed has in the past mused over whether an apostrophe should be indicated in enumerations, eg should FOC’S’LE be shown as (6, 2 apostrophes). The norm in both barred and blocked puzzles is to ignore apostrophes, along with other evidence of omitted letters such as the circumflex (‘the tombstone for a departed S’, as our French master called it). I think this makes sense, as things could otherwise get very complicated for answers like ‘chargé-d’affaires’.

        The standard for barred puzzles in all publications that I am aware of other than the Spectator (which uses blocked puzzle style enumerations) is to ignore hyphens when giving the lengths of answers and to show answers consisting of multiple words simply as (total length, n words). Some compounds which Chambers shows as being hyphenated are often seen these days as single words (eg ‘hard-wired’), but others seem more like two words (eg ‘lion-cub’). The argument, I think, is that barred puzzle solvers get at least two-thirds of the letters in every entry checked, and to give them enumerations such as (1,2,5) or (5-3-2) would be unduly helpful. I’m so used to the practice that I just accept it, but I do often mention it in the notes for clues with hyphenated answers.

  8. Doctor Clue says:

    My apologies to anyone who found that the link to this puzzle wasn’t working. Because I was going to the Listener Dinner on Saturday and travelling home on Sunday, I managed to download a copy of the puzzle in advance, write the notes, check them through, and schedule the blog for publication; unfortunately, I wasn’t able to re-check it once it appeared, which might (or might not) explain my error regarding the enumeration of 10a, and the ‘unspoonersims’, but does explain the problem with the link. It’s now fixed, but I’m sorry for anyone who was trying – and failing – to use the erroneous link.

  9. JOHN ATKINSON says:

    Great fun. My idea of a perfect Sunday. A good crossie and a tot of pee.

    PS ‘unspoonersims’?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Whoops! I was expecting the spelling checker to flag up the word anyway, and failed to notice my lad saps. Thanks, John.

  10. Alex says:

    Hi Doc,thanks again for the blog. I think this ‘special’ is great fun and a tricky but fair challenge, an encouraging sign for the future. I was pleased that Gemelo stuck with ‘standard’ Spoonerisms (not the ‘vocalic’ type). many of them very cleverly disguised. A couple of minor queries. 1. 32a is presented as an anagram (I think) – is it not more suited to container/contents? 2. In 19d ‘OF’ is certainly required for the de-Spoonerised reading but doesn’t seem right for the Spoonerised surface. In Scotland we would say…bought something ‘OFF’ someone… Or is it a regional difference?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi Alex

      I too was glad to see the back of the ‘vocalic’ spoonerism [the sort for which Azed’s example was normally ‘bin tongue’ for ‘bunting’] – I’m not sure that such a thing is even a spoonerism given the typical dictionary definition of the word.

      I raised an eyebrow very slightly over the anagram at 32a, but the answer is a rearrangement of ONCE PRIZE; that said, it is also (as you note) an anagram of the former contained by the latter, and in tariff scale of clues, (X* in Y) scores more highly than (X + Y)*. I’ve encountered a similar problem myself where I had an anagram clue that I was keen to use, but the answer was in fact a reversal of the fodder; I reluctantly decided not to use the clue for aesthetic reasons. Neither my clue nor Gemelo’s here could be considered unsound or unfair, of course, but something like ‘Lie a crowd once spread suppressed by champion’ might be preferable.

      The surface in 19d certainly does indeed seem stilted; OED says that the verb can be construed with ‘of’ or ‘from’, but I think the latter has completely replaced the former in modern usage.

  11. Brian S says:

    Your link to this crossword has been blocked. ‘Access denied’.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      I’m very sorry about the error (see my comment above) and for not picking up the problem sooner – unfortunately I was ‘in transit’ 🚐

  12. 🍊 says:

    10a (1, 5, 3) methinks

    One thrive fee 😉

    • pythagtemp says:

      Thank you! It’s not an expression I’d ever met, but Chambers confirms it.

      • Fi Buddled says:

        10ac Can’t find it in Chambers 11th ed or Chambers online – or anywhere else online. I can’t see how I’ve got it wrong but I must be missing something.

        • Doctor Clue says:

          Hi Fi Buddled

          The answer is very difficult to locate in the printed version of Chambers. If you look up the five-letter second word without its last letter, you will find an entry which says ‘???? or ????? (Shakesp) earlier forms of pip[4]‘; under the entry for pip[4] the phrase required here should be shown.

          I hope you are now Len Eyetund.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Thanks, 🍊 – I’d managed to spoonerize the remuneration (aka the one thrive fee). Now sorted.